Glossary / Lexicon

Deutsch: Konflikt / Español: Conflicto / Português: Conflito / Français: Conflit / Italiano: Conflitto

Conflict in the context of quality management refers to disagreements or clashes between individuals, teams, departments, or stakeholders that arise from differing objectives, priorities, or perspectives regarding quality standards, processes, or improvements. These conflicts can impact the effectiveness of quality management systems (QMS) by delaying decisions, lowering productivity, or compromising product or service quality.

Description

In quality management, conflict can emerge from a variety of situations where there are competing interests or differing opinions on how to achieve quality goals. These conflicts may arise internally within the organisation or externally with suppliers, customers, or regulatory bodies. While conflict is not inherently negative, unresolved or poorly managed conflicts can hinder quality improvement efforts and reduce overall organisational effectiveness.

Key sources of conflict in quality management include:

• Differing Priorities: Conflict often arises when different departments or teams have conflicting priorities. For example, the production team may focus on increasing output, while the quality control team is more concerned with reducing defects, potentially slowing down production.
• Resource Allocation: Disagreements over how to allocate resources, such as time, budget, or personnel, can lead to conflict, especially when quality management initiatives require additional investment or affect other operational goals.
• Process Change Resistance: When implementing new quality improvement measures, such as introducing Lean or Six Sigma methodologies, some employees or departments may resist change, leading to conflicts with those driving the quality initiatives.
• Compliance vs. Efficiency: Quality management often requires compliance with strict standards and protocols, which can conflict with operational efficiency or cost-cutting efforts. For example, adhering to ISO 9001 standards may require extra steps that some departments view as unnecessary or inefficient.
• Supplier and External Conflicts: Conflicts may arise with external suppliers or partners when they fail to meet the quality standards required by the company, resulting in delays, rework, or compromised product quality.

Conflict in quality management can be both positive and negative:

• Constructive Conflict: When managed properly, conflict can lead to innovation, process improvements, and better decision-making. Constructive conflict encourages open discussions about quality issues, allowing teams to find optimal solutions and improve their processes.
• Destructive Conflict: When conflicts are not managed effectively, they can lead to disruptions, decreased productivity, frustration among employees, and ultimately, a decline in quality. This type of conflict often results in unresolved issues, blame-shifting, and poor communication, which can hinder the implementation of a QMS.

Effective conflict resolution is essential to maintaining a successful quality management system. Organisations can mitigate the negative impacts of conflict by:

• Open Communication: Encouraging open communication between teams and departments helps to address conflicts early and promotes transparency in decision-making processes.
• Collaborative Problem Solving: Involving all relevant stakeholders in discussions around quality issues ensures that different perspectives are considered, leading to more balanced solutions.
• Training and Mediation: Providing conflict resolution training and involving mediators or facilitators can help teams address disputes constructively, reducing the likelihood of prolonged or unresolved conflicts.

For example, in a manufacturing company, the quality assurance team may have stringent requirements for testing, which could slow down production. This might lead to conflict with the operations team, whose goal is to meet high production quotas. To resolve this conflict, both teams could collaborate to find ways to streamline testing processes while maintaining quality standards.

Application Areas

Conflict in quality management can occur across various industries and sectors:

• Manufacturing: Conflicts between production teams and quality control over balancing output with defect reduction are common. Additionally, conflicts with suppliers over raw material quality can affect production timelines.
• Healthcare: Conflicts can arise between medical staff, administrators, and quality managers over implementing patient safety protocols or adhering to regulatory requirements versus providing timely care.
• Construction: In construction, conflicts can occur between project managers, contractors, and inspectors over compliance with building standards, cost-cutting measures, and timelines.
• Software Development: Quality assurance teams may clash with development teams over the need for more testing time, potentially delaying releases, while developers may push for faster rollouts.

Well-Known Examples

1. Lean vs. Traditional Manufacturing Conflicts: In companies transitioning to Lean Manufacturing practices, conflicts often arise between employees accustomed to traditional methods and those advocating for streamlined, continuous improvement-focused processes. Resistance to new methods can slow down quality improvements.
2. Automotive Industry Supplier Conflicts: Automotive companies like Toyota and Ford have faced conflicts with suppliers over meeting strict quality standards, leading to delays in production and even recalls when quality issues were not resolved early enough.
3. Healthcare Conflicts: Conflicts between healthcare providers and administrators over balancing patient care quality with cost-efficiency measures can lead to disputes, particularly when it comes to implementing new safety or quality protocols.

Risks and Challenges

Conflict in quality management presents several risks and challenges:

• Disruption of Workflows: Unresolved conflicts can cause delays in decision-making or slow down production processes, leading to missed deadlines or compromised quality.
• Lower Morale and Productivity: Prolonged conflict can demotivate employees, reducing their engagement and productivity, which can affect overall quality outcomes.
• Compromised Quality: When conflicts go unresolved, teams may cut corners, neglect quality standards, or make rushed decisions, all of which can result in defects or non-compliance with regulations.
• Customer Dissatisfaction: Conflicts that lead to quality issues can result in product recalls, service failures, or unmet customer expectations, ultimately damaging the organisation’s reputation.

Similar Terms

• Disagreement: A broader term for any difference in opinion, often a precursor to conflict. While disagreements are natural, they can escalate into conflict if not managed.
• Tension: Refers to a strained or stressful atmosphere that may arise from unresolved conflict or differing opinions in quality management.
• Resistance to Change: A specific type of conflict where employees or departments resist new quality initiatives, often due to fear of uncertainty or disruption to established workflows.

Weblinks

• psychology-lexicon.com: 'Conflict' in the psychology-lexicon.com

Summary

In the quality management context, conflict refers to disagreements or clashes between teams, departments, or stakeholders over issues related to quality standards, processes, or priorities. While conflicts can arise from differing goals or perspectives, they can be either constructive or destructive depending on how they are managed. Constructive conflict can lead to innovation and process improvements, while unresolved or poorly handled conflict can hinder quality outcomes, reduce productivity, and lead to customer dissatisfaction. Effective communication, collaborative problem solving, and conflict resolution strategies are essential to minimising the negative impact of conflict in quality management.

--

You have no rights to post comments